Information on Result #511339
There is no (65, 99, 4921317)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161391 024312 365541 011881 700759 068828 470130 128490 591302 430226 707039 856563 847789 370956 559439 602360 763528 090501 337407 110136 > 1699
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (65, 100, 4921317)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction |