Information on Result #511339

There is no (65, 99, 4921317)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 161391 024312 365541 011881 700759 068828 470130 128490 591302 430226 707039 856563 847789 370956 559439 602360 763528 090501 337407 110136 > 1699

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 100, 4921317)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction