Information on Result #511797
There is no (20, 116, 989)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 47 827725 497305 438522 471183 368642 910550 421909 450297 885281 483969 025203 083275 342902 428776 902084 550031 107593 375021 641023 999105 933260 912142 876706 > 16116
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 117, 989)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |