Information on Result #511937
There is no (52, 120, 16022)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 3 123110 033262 121474 360293 910794 803638 332163 848747 625849 292970 129516 651422 981499 336805 092226 358355 185274 092300 122988 694288 308520 642856 289799 653896 > 16120
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (52, 121, 16022)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |