Information on Result #512081
There is no (21, 125, 1029)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 3 299874 612007 740186 166965 308314 805699 466804 848411 342699 069425 004404 012803 756642 721366 806807 878279 092063 412766 826564 329536 847194 048072 647986 561148 050496 > 16125
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 126, 1029)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |