Information on Result #512085

There is no (29, 125, 1682)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 3 351033 416442 887790 169068 984566 336177 080454 157160 206432 640460 738413 363129 144285 895083 971309 039559 331632 795131 072591 316292 722093 364000 086259 495996 355316 > 16125

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 126, 1682)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction