Information on Result #512103
There is no (65, 125, 83518)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 3 273813 180851 625322 250727 714156 524694 387227 936716 672404 665534 856962 652464 592478 715807 471558 448682 243241 747004 043999 108293 022728 539898 961937 392338 300976 > 16125
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (65, 126, 83518)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |