Information on Result #512178
There is no (18, 128, 872)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 13446 840952 776833 271765 835649 864126 074495 054058 701988 827598 576302 295968 510504 143322 621420 316965 898424 424540 296664 357726 461324 820450 565746 439338 061849 194276 > 16128
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (18, 129, 872)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (18, 130, 872)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||