Information on Result #512213
There is no (21, 129, 1022)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 214781 894792 980020 509614 530140 350144 214630 880835 283757 931876 780756 202478 626647 430629 012583 363996 438368 795054 906051 413880 639291 543394 316304 705638 525722 848996 > 16129
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 130, 1022)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |