Information on Result #512217
There is no (29, 129, 1633)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 216916 438904 721276 041277 269052 458842 819968 224986 501798 925669 438168 028539 676954 579208 806006 663767 471541 845060 049790 007083 311527 978176 877199 172014 025212 225376 > 16129
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (29, 130, 1633)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |