Information on Result #512218
There is no (31, 129, 1858)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 217039 416607 195394 022994 168516 162895 078849 808463 125820 686433 829769 513180 013257 234857 721872 808048 011312 210234 416540 660046 831371 900979 047963 571162 228891 474356 > 16129
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (31, 130, 1858)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |