Information on Result #512324
There is no (2, 18, 216)-net in base 25, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 14 881355 721034 799302 301185 > 2518
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (2, 19, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (2, 20, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (2, 21, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (2, 22, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (2, 23, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (2, 24, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (2, 25, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (2, 26, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (2, 27, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (2, 28, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (2, 29, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (2, 30, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (2, 31, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (2, 32, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (2, 33, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (2, 34, 216)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||