Information on Result #515855
There is no (9, 61, 1144)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 65 982656 006630 527565 836529 141910 049856 557935 961260 574330 004879 375399 944031 419811 473560 233180 > 3261
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 62, 1144)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |