Information on Result #515901
There is no (10, 64, 1289)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 146995 721119 835873 204777 207373 021619 569003 266855 199072 083215 741792 289108 306722 558222 184103 103232 > 3264
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (10, 65, 1289)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |