Information on Result #515916
There is no (9, 65, 1123)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 69 050576 851522 346100 690585 143218 335941 653911 284641 884933 343120 474833 556806 534289 396715 935495 666808 > 3265
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 66, 1123)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |