Information on Result #516163
There is no (9, 79, 1102)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 80714 773630 284453 729957 110611 230211 848287 485471 881277 628302 334531 254108 666134 586167 277475 348234 216991 667117 108461 316764 > 3279
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (9, 80, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (9, 81, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
3 | No (9, 82, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
4 | No (9, 83, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
5 | No (9, 84, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
6 | No (9, 85, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
7 | No (9, 86, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
8 | No (9, 87, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
9 | No (9, 88, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
10 | No (9, 89, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
11 | No (9, 90, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
12 | No (9, 91, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
13 | No (9, 92, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
14 | No (9, 93, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
15 | No (9, 94, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
16 | No (9, 95, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
17 | No (9, 96, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
18 | No (9, 97, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
19 | No (9, 98, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
20 | No (9, 99, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
21 | No (9, 100, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
22 | No (9, 101, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
23 | No (9, 102, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
24 | No (9, 103, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
25 | No (9, 104, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
26 | No (9, 105, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
27 | No (9, 106, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
28 | No (9, 107, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
29 | No (9, 108, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
30 | No (9, 109, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
31 | No (9, 110, 1102)-net in base 32 | [i] |