Information on Result #516368
There is no (13, 89, 1605)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 91 695021 679104 489316 344062 517694 437266 636611 488649 975307 327877 577829 856462 368774 132364 958122 218580 786062 848894 190649 426762 353538 674784 > 3289
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (13, 90, 1605)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |