Information on Result #516391
There is no (16, 90, 2148)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2948 425809 603758 761322 951304 066237 485533 997194 506256 473668 279757 630988 075547 705336 993712 855640 268760 245588 191813 504502 880364 515080 404656 > 3290
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 91, 2148)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |