Information on Result #516435
There is no (16, 92, 2116)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 989860 888378 243026 354943 145989 150201 822005 988419 563098 814440 805867 098601 582563 538487 304482 107344 372526 398968 350559 801422 579155 037221 014352 > 3292
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 93, 2116)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |