Information on Result #516443
There is no (32, 92, 16026)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2 982024 308911 287010 079790 738457 459279 983754 743410 458823 037281 502577 338954 293327 899710 338375 719291 420052 649058 003797 638910 608569 472585 115456 > 3292
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (32, 93, 16026)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |