Information on Result #516511

There is no (33, 95, 16399)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 97646 227076 141770 170823 160295 214051 689717 024870 204285 162312 766389 614902 119569 002290 250481 960193 547546 614107 539413 337873 094622 391707 402609 377280 > 3295

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (33, 96, 16399)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction