Information on Result #516667

There is no (16, 102, 2003)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3363 298195 167580 925726 844557 903615 627937 175757 946901 807124 380766 926868 407817 648422 375279 135473 238074 337188 742060 785866 116601 391026 315665 540813 222931 020128 > 32102

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 103, 2003)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction