Information on Result #516750
There is no (33, 105, 11290)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 109 971398 101058 511679 342800 169461 260167 043807 868978 620305 646213 844663 860026 573371 419092 493558 510288 595743 799828 152790 799942 433196 893625 619241 028064 486197 353664 > 32105
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (33, 106, 11290)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction |