Information on Result #517013

There is no (3, 31, 690)-net in base 49, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 25135 318834 925955 294352 218974 734045 280807 471579 583553 > 4931

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (3, 32, 690)-net in base 49 [i]m-Reduction
2No (3, 33, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
3No (3, 34, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
4No (3, 35, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
5No (3, 36, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
6No (3, 37, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
7No (3, 38, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
8No (3, 39, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
9No (3, 40, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
10No (3, 41, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
11No (3, 42, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
12No (3, 43, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
13No (3, 44, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
14No (3, 45, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
15No (3, 46, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
16No (3, 47, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
17No (3, 48, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
18No (3, 49, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
19No (3, 50, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
20No (3, 51, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
21No (3, 52, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
22No (3, 53, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
23No (3, 54, 690)-net in base 49 [i]
24No (3, 55, 690)-net in base 49 [i]