Information on Result #517090
There is no (4, 40, 889)-net in base 49, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 41 088966 398763 740281 328466 068448 579671 833172 781869 603508 312578 911585 > 4940
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 41, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (4, 42, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (4, 43, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (4, 44, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (4, 45, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (4, 46, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (4, 47, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (4, 48, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (4, 49, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (4, 50, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (4, 51, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (4, 52, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (4, 53, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (4, 54, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (4, 55, 889)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||