Information on Result #517278
There is no (2, 8, 1890)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 281 823792 021136 > 648
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (2, 9, 1890)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |