Information on Result #517278

There is no (2, 8, 1890)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 281 823792 021136 > 648

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (2, 9, 1890)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction