Information on Result #517303

There is no (4, 16, 3112)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 79272 040126 271674 849676 214175 > 6416

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (4, 17, 3112)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction