Information on Result #517360
There is no (9, 27, 17253)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 5 848195 863631 214072 692680 845534 943066 732556 125424 > 6427
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 28, 17253)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |