Information on Result #517488

There is no (9, 43, 4211)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 464246 954602 091890 037694 052695 506853 296131 562871 186054 343408 747465 314215 165050 > 6443

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 44, 4211)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction