Information on Result #517556
There is no (21, 49, 201249)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 31829 855096 047865 091711 853487 959159 556217 087653 787767 964235 637383 561897 707502 064156 977744 > 6449
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 50, 201249)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |