Information on Result #517572
There is no (9, 51, 3344)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 130 472986 767342 224491 327611 129440 094961 648774 023832 594537 619746 667631 445718 685891 491312 253712 > 6451
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 52, 3344)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |