Information on Result #517644

There is no (9, 57, 3020)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8 964514 770615 413042 394545 648716 745290 694237 900151 903409 347232 632980 591236 130244 455310 491934 802162 254604 > 6457

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 58, 3020)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction