Information on Result #517725
There is no (9, 63, 2828)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 617521 179611 355757 917265 768371 910963 766436 100285 872319 480618 618823 397062 662643 849636 532534 887002 012979 387634 836944 > 6463
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 64, 2828)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |