Information on Result #517742
There is no (16, 64, 10186)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 39 418779 853939 213772 621381 718927 418660 655675 820468 922201 437311 382444 130198 938963 284632 108134 076339 321096 250971 187356 > 6464
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 65, 10186)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |