Information on Result #517759
There is no (21, 65, 31175)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 2522 271905 898122 279910 116298 003762 289743 613057 889256 576340 357166 499935 887270 021645 625700 376749 791878 479251 486950 875316 > 6465
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 66, 31175)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |