Information on Result #517850

There is no (23, 71, 34289)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 173 298117 875643 986528 510339 390472 349212 901377 986771 875501 958797 210339 107835 033552 646288 270091 785934 273695 701666 894795 011679 090324 > 6471

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (23, 72, 34289)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction