Information on Result #517969

There is no (32, 78, 199709)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 762 170756 218664 976612 928777 944149 386464 164174 655514 531692 906446 800209 545337 797991 943370 462640 985576 820666 248677 027612 182110 916683 019678 351128 > 6478

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 79, 199709)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction