Information on Result #517986

There is no (31, 79, 137192)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 48782 157630 479496 702701 896444 848519 354954 066390 816729 033042 859413 196361 214277 946035 002958 331125 265267 411392 089614 443317 279406 767718 437992 721436 > 6479

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (31, 80, 137192)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction