Information on Result #518004

There is no (32, 80, 163152)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 3 122080 861518 448831 733327 728099 046038 901124 228605 937675 823677 653932 364259 960386 985130 109837 378167 182475 455599 500677 139587 424965 375606 759784 219564 > 6480

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 81, 163152)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction