Information on Result #518010

There is no (9, 81, 2608)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 199 808802 399326 747494 997277 422464 760503 731859 131976 355357 077518 957128 150558 055360 501127 565968 035843 855543 871991 285269 070788 538157 197243 484786 435745 > 6481

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 82, 2608)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction