Information on Result #518031
There is no (16, 82, 6412)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 12799 860856 896916 006462 652430 361160 706042 932413 449577 493277 329056 629186 642463 728217 332605 123118 594960 071829 414940 667454 670499 893278 044786 531667 866680 > 6482
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 83, 6412)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |