Information on Result #518034
There is no (22, 82, 16518)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 12796 331970 690526 896347 865377 281869 379648 063236 377156 302987 060257 807609 110888 957865 735098 128716 625431 069200 066785 835758 414153 354209 031168 913424 584512 > 6482
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (22, 83, 16518)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |