Information on Result #518069
There is no (20, 84, 11173)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 52 486889 659327 584126 579806 229727 369524 261640 050441 226285 160388 637395 711747 211931 181822 092916 453408 139904 380587 095831 171649 304994 258300 808944 363858 334061 > 6484
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (20, 85, 11173)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |