Information on Result #518120
There is no (9, 87, 2595)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 13 913563 691894 496464 710890 382387 702477 105872 129735 853646 249780 756300 432234 792839 692079 885237 562267 741774 484856 501905 117145 361509 501416 262061 610404 176852 088320 > 6487
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 88, 2595)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |