Information on Result #518139

There is no (10, 88, 2889)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 887 835784 674876 456617 977326 422252 218506 566201 271555 541376 820702 982719 673151 953348 689498 585124 182892 636549 815727 469490 799460 911292 132139 784067 725617 157133 258128 > 6488

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (10, 89, 2889)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction