Information on Result #518144
There is no (20, 88, 10145)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 880 554102 072656 757132 872364 596184 585736 017621 606892 908704 863964 402638 045543 869500 529893 690958 625177 797001 368307 697717 144492 561491 218042 645795 246529 545883 170112 > 6488
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (20, 89, 10145)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |