Information on Result #518145
There is no (22, 88, 13677)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 880 137715 166775 518206 169460 220241 634699 736281 183572 951223 372021 795331 038834 880791 727532 179744 697739 077401 183161 806698 419375 191325 040354 703818 552413 358607 761180 > 6488
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (22, 89, 13677)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |