Information on Result #518147
There is no (26, 88, 26404)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 879 412678 515866 575072 485100 326475 449439 566488 024012 792146 331220 169844 749272 885918 481116 549644 413390 303372 057295 659469 586298 171765 755164 513158 602501 059389 902904 > 6488
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (26, 89, 26404)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |