Information on Result #518158
There is no (9, 89, 2594)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 56871 629358 755027 837595 199195 900619 250061 794558 164966 208783 048022 779582 893229 756197 014384 876664 660879 870684 484147 016361 849506 132893 688501 430714 490122 782649 154496 > 6489
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 90, 2594)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (9, 91, 2594)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||