Information on Result #518159
There is no (11, 89, 3216)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 56612 532648 111814 288838 091826 780375 805995 153093 687712 373806 649660 316870 674565 114165 777264 893671 504464 688580 561027 516917 254877 970941 032167 791716 894630 654880 245180 > 6489
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (11, 90, 3216)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |