Information on Result #518164
There is no (21, 89, 11467)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 56315 371150 045593 542855 507003 442206 024367 520464 116636 921337 351187 328986 627635 257874 299243 653143 791255 868751 371455 565633 628711 758061 812565 424011 371727 778906 683186 > 6489
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 90, 11467)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |